Friday, August 22, 2025
Fairy Tales and the Cosmos - quote by G.K. Chesterton
Thursday, August 7, 2025
Orthodoxy by G.K. Chesterton
G.K. Chesterton is one of the great thinkers of the 20th century, but sometimes his brilliance can be blinding, and I struggle to grasp his meanings. That certainly hasn’t kept me from trying (as my book log of 17 of his titles shows!)
Chesterton is best remembered for responding to the famous skeptics of his day (George Bernard Shaw, Oscar Wilde, and Frederick Nietzsche, to name a few) with his hard-hitting yet witty counter-arguments against their staunch atheism. Orthodoxy, his best-known rebuttal, outlines his reasons for embracing Christian truths. His principal reason was that Christianity is the only religion that gives a sane explanation for this world. But he is quick to say that it is more than a conglomeration of right opinions: I will not call it my philosophy; for I did not make it. God and humanity made it; and it made me.
One quote
from the book has stayed with me for many weeks. What we suffer from today is
humility in the wrong place. Modesty had moved from the organ of ambition and
has settled upon the organ of conviction, where it was never meant to be. A man
was meant to be doubtful about himself, but undoubting about the truth; this
has been exactly reversed. Nowadays the part of a man that a man does assert is
exactly the part that he ought not to assert – himself. The part he doubts is
exactly the part he ought not to doubt – the Divine Reason. This seems to
define so much of the thinking I see in our culture (i.e. the triumph of
self-delusion over clear biblical precepts).
Chesterton’s
sense of wonder and “joie de vivre” keep his writings from being too didactic.
I especially loved Chapter 4 on how fairy tales shaped his heart to believe in
God. I had always believed that the world involved magic; now I thought that
perhaps it involved a magician. Later he remarks, I left the fairy tales on
the nursery floor and have not found any books so sensible since. (!)
His closing
chapter was on the healthful confines of Christianity. Within its supposedly
constricting limits, there is unrestricted joy. He writes, Catholic doctrine
and discipline may be walls, but they are the walls of a playground. He writes
beautifully of the freedom and exhilaration of knowing one’s Creator and of
knowing one’s purpose as His creatures (as opposed to the despair of nihilism.)
I’ll leave
you with one final quote by G.K. on the Trinity: It is indeed a fathomless
mystery of theology. Suffice it to say that this triple enigma is as comforting
as wine and as open as an English fireside; this thing that bewilders the
intellect utterly quiets the heart.
This was my
bedtime book for many months. I read two to three pages per night because that
was all my brain could handle. But I think Chesterton is better read in small,
well-chewed bites. It doesn’t do to read him in a hurry.
Friday, July 25, 2025
Green Dolphin Street by Elizabeth Goudge
Green DolphinStreet is the story of two sisters who live in the Channel Islands in the mid-1800s.
Marguerite and Marianne couldn’t be more different. Marguerite (like her name "daisy") is cheerful and carefree, ready to drink in whatever joys life has to
offer. Marianne is less beautiful and much less easily pleased. But she has a
thirst for knowledge and for experiences that make her sturdier and more
dependable in times of trouble.
Her parents
were much exercised over this brain of Marianne’s and were doing their best to
repress it within ladylike proportions. But Marrianne wouldn’t be interested in
sensible things like crewel work and water-color painting and duet playing on
the pianoforte with her little sister Marguerite, even though she did all these
things superlatively well. That was the trouble with Marianne, she did them too
well, and her restless intellect reached out beyond them to things like
mathematics and the politics of the Island parliament, farming, fishing, and
sailing, knowledge that was neither attractive nor necessary in a woman and
would add nothing whatever to her chances of attracting a suitable husband…
Marianne and Marguerite fall in love with the same young man, William Ozanne. I can’t tell you which one he chooses, but I can say that this novel is no fluffy romance. Instead it’s about the high cost of loving. The original title was “Green Dolphin Country,” which was more appropriate because each character in the book is yearning to find their own “country”, the place where they feel most at home. Some look for this in the love of another person. Others seek it in adventurous places. But all of them learn that this longed-for fulfillment comes at a very high price – death to self. Elizabeth Goudge is a master at this type of story. She writes of flawed people who through their disappointments learn to love in richer ways. Self-giving love is the key to finding their “country,” their native soil.
Goudge is not only a master of writing deeply, she also writes beautifully. Here is a description of the Mother Abess’ room in a convent: In spite of its austerity the room was not cold. It was very beautiful in its simplicity, and Marguerite within the flushed white walls felt as though she were inside a mother-of-pearl shell.
And this description of a loving kiss: It neither promised nor gave security, it was rather a dedication of themselves in comradeship to the danger and pain of living.
I started this book carefully noting passages that I wanted to highlight here on my blog, but ditched that as soon as I became engrossed in the story. When I came down to earth near the end of the book, I finally stopped to underline many beautiful paragraphs. By that time, I didn’t care if I ever blogged about this book or not. I was just glad to have experienced it. My copy is
almost 500 pages long so it’s not an easy read, but if you like a well-told story, you’ll be glad to make the effort.
Blessings,
Friday, July 11, 2025
"Adventures Among Books" by Andrew Lang
Lang calls this essay his literary biography saying that he has a much easier time remembering books than he does people. He writes, Some are soldiers from the cradle, some merchants, some orators; nothing but the love of books was the gift given to me by the fairies.
From an early age he was surrounded by books and those who loved to read them. He remembers “reading” Midsummer Night’s Dream as a small boy in a candlelit room where someone was playing the piano; he was sitting by the fire looking at an edition with pictures of fairies in it. The fairies seemed to come out of Shakespeare’s dream into the music and the firelight… It seemed an enchanted glimpse of Paradise.
At age four he began to teach himself to read by picking out the words and letters of a poem he had heard so often that he had it memorized: Elegy on the Death andBurial of Cock Robin. At age nine, he read his first novel, which was Jane Eyre. This was a creepy tale for a boy of nine, and Rochester was a mystery, St. John a bore. But the lonely girl in her despair, when something came into her room, and her days of starvation at school, and the terrible first Mrs. Rochester, were never to be forgotten.
He tells how he hated Greek until he discovered Homer. The very sound of the hexameter, that long, inimitable roll of the most various music, was enough to win the heart, even if the words were not understood. But the words proved unexpectedly easy to understand, full as they are of all nobility, all tenderness, all courage, courtesy, and romance…. After once being initiated into the mysteries of Greece by Homer, the work of Greek was no longer tedious.
He
summarizes his love of all things Greek by writing, We cannot find any wisdom
more wise than that which bids us do what men may and bear what men must. Such
are the lessons of the Greeks, of the people who tried all things, in the
morning of the world, and who still speak to us of what they tried in words
which are the sum of human gaiety and gloom, of grief and triumph, hope and
despair. The world, since their day, has but followed in the same round, which
only seems new: has only made the same experiments and failed with the same
failure, but less gallantly and less gloriously.
“AdventuresAmong Books” was written in 1872 when Lang was still a young man. Near the end
of the essay, he writes about how he became interested in folklore and
anthropology. Little did he know that his most memorable life’s work would grow
out of that interest. The first “Fairy Book” was published in 1889.
Blessings,
Friday, June 27, 2025
The Franchise Affair by Josephine Tey
The “star” of this book is Robert Blair, a small-town lawyer who has spent his life in moderate tranquility, living with a maiden aunt, playing golf on his off hours, and working mostly with people who want their wills written. As the novel opens, he is sitting down to his habitual afternoon tea: At 3:50 on every working day Miss Tuff bore into his office a lacquer tray covered with a fair white cloth and bearing a cup of tea in blue-patterned china, and, on a plate to match, two biscuits.
Suddenly the monotony rankles him. “Isn’t there more to life?”
he wonders. Within moments he receives a desperate phone call from a woman he has
never met pleading with him to help prove her innocence. His life changes abruptly
as he is drawn into the troubles of Marion Sharpe and her elderly mother who
have been accused of kidnapping a 15-year-old girl.
The rest of
the novel shows Robert acting as amateur sleuth, following up every possible lead
to discover the truth. With all the evidence against them, the reader sometimes
wonders if the Sharpe women are lying to him, which adds to the tension of the
story. Though most of the townspeople turn against Marion and her mother, there
is a rich cast of characters who risk their standing in the community to support
them and they do their best to help Robert solve the case.
The
characters are well drawn and the writing is lovely. There is a hint of romance,
but it takes a back seat to the mystery. I liked this book when I read it a few
years ago, but I loved it this time around because of the excellent audiobook
narrated by Karen Cass.
This was an
especially timely read because it shows how trusting people can be of the media, never questioning if something in print might be true or not. Tey is not heavy-handed
about this, but it is interwoven into the story in a way that kept me chuckling
throughout.
Friday, June 13, 2025
The Literary Lives of the Inklings by Philip and Carol Zaleski
Philip and Carol Zaleski have given us a great gift with their painstaking research on each of the major inklings (J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams and Owen Barfield) and how their lives and writings intertwined. The name “Inklings”, according to Tolkien, was little more than a “pleasantly ingenious pun suggesting people with vague or half-formed intimations and ideas, plus those who dabble in ink.” But History would record that, however modest their pretensions, their inkblots were no mere dabblings.
The group came together at a strategic time. WWI had left many in despair, but in others it had instilled a longing to reclaim the goodness, beauty, and cultural continuity that had been so violently disrupted. The Inklings came together because they shared that longing; they believed, as did their literary and spiritual ancestors, that ours is a fallen world yet not a forsaken one, which was a belief that set them at odds with many of their contemporaries. Lewis described the Inklings to Williams as “a group of Christians who like to write.” The Zaleskis add that they shared more common characteristics than that including intellectual vivacity, love of myth, conservative politics, memories of war, and a passion for beef, beer, and verbal battle.
The book highlights the idiosyncrasies of each member of the group beginning with Tolkien’s rapid, slurring, unintelligible lectures, which students endured because, as one student remarked, “Tolkien could turn a lecture into a mead hall in which he was the bard and we were the feasting, listening guest. Speaking in Anglo-Saxon turned Tolkien’s leaden tongue to gold.” I was particularly interested in the details of Charles Williams' life because of C.S. Lewis' glowing accounts of him in his letters. The Zaleski's paint quite a different picture of him as a very strange man!
They also describe
the periodic friction between the members, particularly Tolkien’s impatience with
Williams because he disliked William’s fiction, but also because he distrusted
Williams’ fascination with the occult. Lewis and Barfield disagreed often (and
strongly) on the principles of anthroposophy. At times Tolkien and Lewis clashed
in their literary views, but their friendship endured through the decades. When
Lewis died, Tolkien wrote, “So far I have felt the normal feelings of a man of
my age – like an old tree that is losing all its leaves one by one, but this
feels like an axe-blow near the roots.”
Of course,
in 500 pages, you are bound to find lots more information (trivia?) than in other
books. It was fun to read that some of the early reviews of The Lord of the
Rings called it “juvenile trash” and “an overgrown fairy story” (!)
According
to the Zaleskis, By the time the last inkling passed away on the eve of the 21st
century, the group had altered, in large or small measure, the course of
imaginative literature, Christian theology and philosophy, comparative
mythology, and the scholarly study of the Beowulf author, of Dante, Spenser,
Milton, courtly love, fairy tale, and epic; and drawing as much from their
scholarship as from their experiences of a catastrophic century, they had
fashioned a new narrative of hope amid the ruins of war, industrialization, cultural
disintegration, skepticism, and anomie.
For three months this was my bed-time book, and it brought me many hours of pleasure.
Blessings,
Thursday, May 29, 2025
Worthwhile Movie #23 - The Quiet Man (1952)
When Anthony Esolen featured The Quiet Man as his film-of-the-week (Substack newsletter), I decided to give Wayne another try. I had seen the movie many years ago and thought it a pleasant bit of romantic fluff, but Esolen gave me eyes to look at it in a new way. He said that the movie is actually about quietness.
He writes, Prizefighter Sean Thornton, an Irish-American living in Pittsburgh, has killed his opponent in the ring. It’s an accident, but Sean can’t accept that. So Sean will never fight again, but instead moves back to the old family homestead in a village in Ireland, to farm and pick up the rest of his life, as a peaceful man. He’s made a vow never to throw a punch again. That’s what he intends, but sometimes a man has to fight, regardless of what he’d like, especially if he is fighting for something — or someone — he loves.
In addition to the excellent acting by both Wayne (playing Sean Thornton), Maureen O’Hara (playing Mary Kate Danaher) and the rest of the cast, the scenery is gorgeous and John Ford’s filming is stunning. Mary Kate and Sean fall in love, but his refusal to fight for something that she believes to be her right, gets their relationship off to a rocky start.Esolen concludes his essay, In many ways, The Quiet Man is a film for those who believe in marriage and who know that what men and women do is that staggering and monumental thing, so closely related to tending the soil with love and care: they make children. The dialogue is priceless, yet it all seems perfectly natural, not stylized. We like everybody in The Quiet Man, even granite-jawed old Will Danaher, and there are gestures in the film that are unforgettable for a kind of down-to-earth nobility that I can’t find so well expressed in any other film except for John Ford’s own How Green Was My Valley. Ford was a poet of scene and dialogue and music, and of silences that are more filled with meaning than any words can be. But above all, when you watch this film, have fun! And thank God for the two great sexes that animate the world, because if it weren’t for them, where would we be?
The only free version of the film is a video tape transfer at Internet Archive. If you watch the movie, you will greatly appreciate reading this article about the film AFTER you view it. I loved it, but I'm glad I didn't read it first because of all the spoilers.
Blessings,Friday, May 16, 2025
Is Kindle Unlimited Worth It?
Friday, May 2, 2025
Recommended Poetry Books
Friday, April 18, 2025
Why Poetry by Matthew Zapruder
When I saw Zapruder’s book on Kindle Unlimited, I was eager to see what he had to contribute to the discussion. I was delighted with his opening sally that Poetry isn’t in any danger, and never has been. And I’m quite sure there will be poetry as long as there are people who can speak, and probably even after. [And this delightful jab:] Probably even robots will write it, just as soon as they get souls.
The central
question of the book is how poetry creates a heightened sense of awareness (what
Zapruder calls “a poetic state of mind.”) It happens through the form of the
poem, which guides the mind of a reader. It happens through leaps of
association. And it happens as the poem explores and activates and plays with
the nature of language itself.
He contends
that there is no such thing as poetic language. The words used in poetry are
every day words, but their energy comes primarily from the reanimation and
reactivation of the language we recognize and know. In poetry, we see how
language can be made deliberately strange, how it becomes “difficult” in order
to jar us awake. One of the ways that poetry reanimates language is in its
use of unexpected associations or metaphors. (Like when Emily Dickinson calls a
snake a “whip-lash” or when Richard Crashaw writes that “Graves are beds now
for the weary.”)
He also
insists that poetry is not a secret code, and that it is not written to be
deliberately elusive or obscure. (I would agree up to a point since I find most modern
poetry to be purposefully vague. Ironically, the second half of the book is filled
with examples of modern poems, which Zapruder painstakingly explains because otherwise they make no sense.)
In general,
says, Zapruder, poetry requires no special knowledge, only attention. The
meaning of the poem resides on the page, and is available to an attentive
reader. Paying attention is essential and this close reading of the text is
essential not only for literary enjoyment, but he would add, it’s necessary for
survival in this modern world. The more we are colonized by our devices and
the “information” and “experiences” that they supposedly deliver, the more we
need a true experience of unmonetized attention.
The first half of the book was helpful and insightful; he detours off a few times to decry the evils of climate change, terrorism, inequality, environmental issues, etc. which didn’t seem to have anything to do with the topic. And, as I wrote above, the second half had many examples of difficult poetry that, instead of encouraging people to read it, would scare them off permanently. Still, I enjoyed gaining insights into how poetry makes its impact, and look forward to continuing my journey toward understanding it better.
Thursday, April 3, 2025
Pages from a WII Chaplain's Diary by Clarence E. Walstad
At 40 years of age, successful Lutheran pastor,
Clarence Walstad, enlisted in the army as a chaplain, leaving behind his wife
and their three young children. These are the touching letters he writes to Ruth
describing his 2 ½ years of army life.
The overriding theme of the letters is his desire for the men in his outfit to come to saving faith in Christ. As his ship nears North Africa, he writes: (4/14/43) The morale of the men is good. Wonderful facilities are provided to keep them occupied. They have access at all times to shelves of books, magazines, parlor games, several pianos, victrolas, etc. But ultimately, morale must depend, not on escape mechanisms, but upon the ‘soul that is fixed on God’ by faith.
One of his early assignments was to work in a hospital unit in Morocco connected to a German and Italian POW camp. In July of 1943, he tells a poignant story of playing his autoharp in his office and having the men in the hospital tents begin to sing along with him. Many of these POWs understand a little English, he wrote. All could follow the music. Because many of the Lutheran hymns he knew had been translated from the German, some prisoners joined in the singing in their own language. We harmonized on “Fairest Lord Jesus”, “Oh, Sacred Head now Wounded”, “When I Survey”, and then ended up by singing “Silent Night” in five languages. Several of them broke down as the familiar strains floated out on the night air. Afterward I spoke to them a little to say that though we are enemies there are some things we all have in common: home, mother, God and the love of Jesus, who came to earth that Christmas Eve. Poor lads, they too believe in the cause for which they have been suffering in this malaria infested hole, for almost two years.
Later he is attached to army units in France and
Germany where the men are fighting and he has little opportunity for church
services. I was complaining to my boys today that there just isn’t an awful
lot a chaplain can do here these days as it is suicide to gather men in groups.
But one of the fellows spoke up and said, “Chaplain, just seeing you around
when the shells are flying, is a help.” One of the soldiers attached to that
unit spoke of it as “an awesome sight to see that big man (6’4”) crawling from
foxhole to foxhole with a message of comfort and encouragement from the Lord to
frightened and anxious soldiers during the heat of battle.”
Walstad’s devotion to his calling, his unstinting acts
of service, and his cheerful acceptance of hardships made for heartwarming
letters that bolstered my faith. Without
a doubt, this will be one of my favorite books of the year.
Thursday, March 20, 2025
Family Sabbatical by Carol Ryrie Brink
I wasn’t so
sure about the second book, Family Sabbatical, because the first half was rather silly. Professor
Ridgeway has taken his family to France for six months so that he can do
research. The kids must adapt to living in hotels and are horrified when their
father hires a governess to teach them French. They end up teaching her a lot
of American slang and learn next to nothing. Then they have a Halloween party
complete with a house of horrors. I was okay with that, but not thrilled.
Highly recommended if you are fans of family fiction such as All-of-a-Kind Family, Betsy and Tacy, and the Little House books.
(I am just sorry that the newest book covers for this series are so hideous!)
P.S. This title is also available at Internet Archive.
Thursday, March 6, 2025
The Riddle of the Sands by Erskine Childers
The book
begins with Charles Carruthers, a bored young man looking for a way to fill up
his vacation time before going back to work in the Foreign Office. He receives
a message from Arthur Davies, a university acquaintance, inviting him on a
yachting holiday in the Baltic Sea. When he arrives with all of his baggage, he
discovers that the “yacht” is a tiny disheveled boat and that the holiday is
not going to be at all as he expected. In fact, he and Davies are in for the
adventure of their lives.
As they
explore the Frisian Islands off the coast of Germany, they stumble upon some suspicious
activities that seem to point to a possible German invasion of England. (As I
read, I assumed, of course, that this novel was written during WWI or WWII, but
was surprised to discover it was written in 1903 at a time when nobody considered
that a possibility. No wonder it was a thriller!)
I could not
put this book down. It’s a good thing my husband was travelling while I
listened because I would have ignored him for the three days that I carried
my cell phone around with me to finish it. The narration by Anton Lesser was
stellar. His inflections were outstanding. When the dialogue called for
whispering, heavy breathing, dry wit, male/female voices, or foreign accents,
he did it all with perfection. He had me hanging on every word – even the “boring”
bits about boating!
I was
intrigued not only by the book but by its author’s interesting history. He was
born in London in 1870, grew up in England, and served in the Second Boer War
(1899-1902). Later he became disenchanted with British Imperialism and became
involved in Irish republicanism (a movement to free Ireland from British rule), even smuggling guns into Ireland in 1914.
Although he served England during WW1, he was later blacklisted by the British
for his support of the IRA, even being called “the mischief-making murderous renegade”
by Winston Churchill. In the end, he was shot by a firing squad, not for his
anti-British activities, but for being caught carrying a pistol, which was in violation of
the Emergency Powers Resolution. He was fifty-two years old.
Thursday, February 20, 2025
The Divine Comedy by Dante
Thursday, February 6, 2025
The Common Rule by Justin Whitmel Earley
Justin
Whitmel Earley encourages four daily habits and four weekly habits that are
designed to draw us closer to God and wean us away from dependence on social
media for affirmation and dopamine hits. The daily habits are 1) Kneel for
prayer three times a day, 2) Eat one meal with others, 3) Spend one hour with your
cellphone off, 4) Read Scripture before turning on your phone.
The weekly
habits are 1) Spend one hour of conversation with a friend, 2) Curate your
media (movies/videos) to four hours, 3) Fast from something for 24 hours, and
4) Keep the Sabbath.
The chapter
on Daily Habit #3 (Turn of your phone for one hour a day) was the most
important chapter in the book for me, not because I don’t already limit my cell
phone use, but because it gave good theological reasons for continuing to do
so. Presence is the essence of life itself. It’s at the heart of who we are
because presence is at the core of our relationship with God. From creation to
salvation, the story of the Bible is fundamentally a story of presence. Eden
was Eden because the unmediated presence of God was there. God was with Adam
and Eve till sin broke the bliss of that presence. After they sinned, Adam and
Eve wanted to cover their nakedness and hide. This is the hallmark of life as
we know it now. We hide from each other
and we hide from God. We long for the face of God, but we can’t bear his gaze
either. Sin has turned a people meant for presence into a people of absence.
Fortunately, the story of the Bible doesn’t end there. God in His mercy still
pursues His rebellious children.
Although I
appreciated this book very much, I found parts of it to be annoying (Earley’s
bragging about how good he is at speaking Chinese was one example). Also, the
subtitle of this book could have been “Spiritual Disciplines for Social Justice
Warriors” because of how often he tacked on social justice issues to each
discipline. Don’t get me wrong. I LOVED his emphasis on spiritual disciplines
that are rooted in the two commandments to “Love God and love your neighbor.” What
better motivation can you have for getting off your phone than to be fully present
to those around you and to pursue the goals that God has put into your heart to
fulfill His purposes?
But some of the ways he prescribes to do that are just plain odd. In the chapter on curating your media time, he strongly suggests that you watch things that show the injustice in the world so that you can feel miserable about it. But feeling bad about injustice is not biblical justice. (See Voddie Baucham's explanation of the difference in this video.)
Anyway, this book stretched me in a lot of ways and I'm glad I read it. Any thoughts?
Thursday, January 23, 2025
The Wayne Family Trilogy by Elizabeth Cadell
Thursday, January 9, 2025
Love as a Choice - quote by Jan Karon
I had to love [Dooley] when he threw his shoe at the wall and cussed my dog, love him when he called me names I won’t repeat, love him when he refused to eat what I’d cooked after celebrating and preaching at three Sunday services…. You get the idea. I enjoyed the warm feelings, the stuff of the heart, when it was present between us, as it sometimes was, even in the beginning. But when it wasn’t, there was the will to love him, something like a generator kicking in, a backup.
Excerpt from In the Company of Others, p. 261
I love that simile. When the "power's out" (our own human strength), God gives us the resources to keep on giving and loving.
(Photo by Gabriella Clare Marino at Unsplash)