Adam Nicolson writes, For Homer, suffering is hinged to an unresolvable conflict between two inescapable elements of human nature: the ties
that bind (family, friendship, community) and the blades that cut through those
bindings (such as war). The war is shown against the backdrop of the people,
homes and families of Troy. It is violence against
domestic order.
To Homer, the city, the realm of family and connection, makes a stand against the chaos. In Troy, woven cloth becomes the
medium for his story. When Helen first appears, she is in the hall of her
house, weaving. In Book 3, she is working woven images into a tapestry showing the battles that have been fought over her. Helen, as she remembers the source of
grief, becomes like Homer, the weaver of the tale.
[Outside the gates of Troy] where the battlefield is a
careless and pitiless place, the allure and goodness of the besieged city
become ever more precious. Achilles is determined to destroy the Trojans. They flee from his
wrath back into the city – all except Hector, their champion, who must remain
out on the plain with his adversary.
This is not just the meeting of Achilles and Hector; it is
the deathly confrontation of two ways of understanding the world. The city is
goodness and connection; the battlefield is horror and death. With Hector’s
death, the city’s fabric is irreparably torn.
I have to confess that I missed that theme entirely! But like any classic, there will
always be layers of meaning that surface with each subsequent reading.
I will close with just one quote comparing the two versions
that I read. (Pope gets a bad rap for his translation, but I enjoyed his
energetic eloquence.)
Few and short had his days been when Ajax laid him low, and
he never paid to his parents the debt of a grateful son. (W.H.D. Rouse)
Lamented youth! In life’s first bloom he fell, sent by great Ajax to the shades of hell. (Alexander Pope)







